We follow a double blind peer-review process i.e., the identities of both the author and the reviewer are concealed throughout the peer review process. We are dedicated to prompt evaluation and publication of fully accepted papers in all our journals to ensure a high-quality publication, all submissions undergo a rigorous review process. The manuscript is checked by the journal’s editorial office to ensure the files are complete. Once this is done, the manuscript is assigned to an Editor/Reviewer on the basis of their subject expertise for a recommendation to accept or reject it, or else with a request for revision before it is published. Based on the recommendation of the reviewer’s and editor’s after review, the author is intimated about the acceptance or rejection, major/minor changes of an article.
Steps in Peer Review
- A submitted manuscript is screened by the editorial office to ensure that the submitted article is complete and unpublished.
- Article is sent to minimum 3reviewers for evaluation.
- Reviewers review the article and send their feedback to the editorial office which are analysed by the expert editors for further process with the following recommendation
- Reject: Authors are acknowledged with the review report sent by the editor that the article has been rejected and is no longer considered for publication.
- Accept: If the editor recommends to publish the manuscript unchanged the author will be informed about the manuscript’s acceptance.
- Major/ Minor recommendations: Authors are notified to revise the manuscript with the necessary changes suggested by the reviewer/editor and submit a revised version of their manuscript for further evaluation.
- The article is sent out for re-review for final decision.
- The accepted paper is processed for publication
- Prior to publication, the publisher will send a galley proof to authors to check for final edits.
- The article is published in Acavis Publishers journal.
